Tiny Tapeout GF 0.1Made on a GlobalFoundries private MPW run

Tiny Tapeout's first, experimental GF180MCU chip. Instead of tiles, its 24 projects, all from earlier Tiny Tapeout chips, were built together into one shared block. Eight small blocks beside it test standard cell libraries from GlobalFoundries, Avalon Semiconductors and OSU on this process.

Put your design on the next oneShuttle repository on GitHub

What was built

The chip as a whole: what its projects add up to.

24

Projects

in one shared block

8

Cell tests

and a pad test

800k

Transistors

across the unique designs

72k

Logic cells

gates and flip-flops

Counted inside the blocks: the shared project block (with its multiplexer), the cell tests and the pad test buffer. The pads and the fill are left out.

Get this chip, or make your own

Tiny Tapeout puts many small designs on one chip. Start with a tile, then come back with a whole die.

1
Get a Tiny Tapeout chip

This test chip was not sold. The Tiny Tapeout chips made since come on a board you can plug in and try.

Buy a chip and board
2
Put your design on the next one

Tiny Tapeout GF 26c and 26d take projects until 7 December 2026, to be made on wafer.space Run 3.

Submit a project
3
Make a whole chip of your own

When a design outgrows a few tiles, it can have a die to itself on wafer.space Run 3: orders close 9 December 2026.

Reserve a slot

The die

Every design rendered from the layout at the same scale and placed where it sits on the 2.9 × 2.9 mm die. Point at a block to see its name, and select it for its details.Every block is listed further down.

Block sizes

The blocks on the die, by size.

0.225 × 0.075 mm1
0.225 × 0.225 mm8
1.6 × 1.6 mm1
Total10

Layout on GitHub

Shuttle status

Missed this one? Tiny Tapeout GF 26c and 26d take projects until 7 December 2026: submit a project.

Tiny Tapeout has not published dates after tapeout for this test chip.

How people used their silicon

Where the area of 10 blocks (3 mm² of silicon) actually went

65%
25%
  • Logic cells 65% — gates and flip-flops doing the design's actual work
  • Filler and tap cells 25% — inserted by the tools to keep rows continuous and wells tied
  • Other 10% — routing channels, analog and custom layout, power grid and empty space

What people built

The kinds of design on this chip.

Test structures 9 Shared project block 1

Standard cell libraries

The ready-made gate libraries the designs were built from: how many tracks tall each cell is, and the voltage it runs at.

Standard cell libraryLogic cellsShare
7t-5V gf180mcu_fd_sc_mcu7t5v0 64k 89%
AS 7t-3.3V gf180mcu_as_sc_mcu7t3v3 2k 3%
OSU 12t-3.3V gf180mcu_osu_sc_gp12t3v3 1k 2%
OSU 9t-3.3V gf180mcu_osu_sc_gp9t3v3 1k 2%
7t-5V as 3.3V gf180mcu_hfd_sc_mcu7t5v0 1k 1%
9t-5V gf180mcu_fd_sc_mcu9t5v0 1k 1%
9t-5V as 3.3V gf180mcu_hfd_sc_mcu9t5v0 1k 1%

Area budget of every design

Each bar is one block, split the same way as above. Sorted by how much of the block is logic.

What fits on 1 mm² of GF180MCU silicon?

Theoretical maximum against what designers achieved

The maximum packs one cell type edge to edge with no room for wiring. Real designs need the wiring. Each box gives the most of a cell that fits with any GF180MCU library, then with the libraries this chip used.

~114k

Inverters per mm²

GF180MCU maximum,
with AS 7t-3.3V inv_2

With this chip's libraries:

7t-5V: 114k inv_1

AS 7t-3.3V: 114k inv_2

7t-5V as 3.3V: 114k inv_1

9t-5V: 89k inv_1

9t-5V as 3.3V: 89k inv_1

~91k

NAND gates per mm²

GF180MCU maximum,
with 7t-5V nand2_1

With this chip's libraries:

7t-5V: 91k nand2_1

AS 7t-3.3V: 65k nand2_2

OSU 12t-3.3V: 39k nand2_1

OSU 9t-3.3V: 51k nand2_1

7t-5V as 3.3V: 91k nand2_1

9t-5V: 71k nand2_1

9t-5V as 3.3V: 71k nand2_1

~76k

Buffers per mm²

GF180MCU maximum,
with AS 7t-3.3V buff_2

With this chip's libraries:

7t-5V: 76k buf_1

AS 7t-3.3V: 76k buff_2

7t-5V as 3.3V: 76k buf_1

9t-5V: 59k buf_1

9t-5V as 3.3V: 59k buf_1

~17k

Flip-flops per mm²

GF180MCU maximum,
with AS 7t-3.3V dfxtp_2

With this chip's libraries:

7t-5V: 16k dffq_1

AS 7t-3.3V: 17k dfxtp_2

OSU 12t-3.3V: 9k dff_1

OSU 9t-3.3V: 11k dff_1

7t-5V as 3.3V: 16k dffq_1

9t-5V: 13k dffq_1

9t-5V as 3.3V: 13k dffq_1

25k

Best core average

logic cells/mm² of core — 32% of the buffer maximum

The 24 Tiny Tapeout projects

48k

Densest 0.1 mm square

logic cells per mm² — 63% of the buffer maximum

Cell test: AS 7-track 3.3 V cells

20k

Typical block

median logic cells/mm² of core across 9 digital blocks (1,000 or more logic cells)

29% of the core covered by logic cells

Percentages compare with the buffer maximum for each design's own library: buffers are among the smallest and most common logic cells, so a design made only of buffers, packed edge to edge with no wiring, would reach 100%.

Sizing your own design

This chip had no tiles: its projects shared one block, so it cannot tell you what a tile holds. For tile sizes, see the later chips, from Tiny Tapeout GF 0.2 on.

Logic density of every digital design

A digital block here is one with 1,000 or more logic cells. Solid bar: average over the core. Outlined bar: the densest 0.1 mm square outside SRAM, per mm² (a dash where memory covers most of the design). The scale ends at the buffer theoretical maximum (76k cells/mm²). The numbers are core / densest, in logic cells per mm².

Every digital block's densities as a table
ProjectTilesLibraryLogic cells Inside core
per mm²
Densest 0.1 mm square
per mm²
Core coveredCore
mm²
The 24 Tiny Tapeout projects MAIN 1.6 × 1.6 mm7t-5V 63,000 24,609 43,400 72% 2.56*
Cell test: OSU 12-track 3.3 V cells CEL5 0.225 × 0.225 mmOSU 12t-3.3V 1,082 20,454 29,800 41% 0.05*
Cell test: OSU 9-track 3.3 V cells CEL4 0.225 × 0.225 mmOSU 9t-3.3V 1,081 20,435 32,400 32% 0.05*
Cell test: AS 7-track 3.3 V cells CEL6 0.225 × 0.225 mmAS 7t-3.3V 1,080 20,416 47,900 20% 0.05*
Cell test: AS 7-track 3.3 V cells, second copy CEL7 0.225 × 0.225 mmAS 7t-3.3V 1,080 20,416 47,900 20% 0.05*
Cell test: GF 7-track 5 V cells CEL0 0.225 × 0.225 mm7t-5V 1,074 20,302 45,100 29% 0.05*
Cell test: GF 7-track cells as 3.3 V transistors CEL2 0.225 × 0.225 mm7t-5V as 3.3V 1,074 20,302 45,100 29% 0.05*
Cell test: GF 9-track 5 V cells CEL1 0.225 × 0.225 mm9t-5V 1,071 20,246 44,300 29% 0.05*
Cell test: GF 9-track cells as 3.3 V transistors CEL3 0.225 × 0.225 mm9t-5V as 3.3V 1,071 20,246 44,300 29% 0.05*

The projects

Every project on this chip: an index, then grouped by what it does. Select one for its layout, its measurements and any die photographs.

Designs that grew

Some designs on this chip have been made many times, on earlier and later Tiny Tapeout chips, and several now have a whole die of their own on a wafer.space run. The ringed marker is this chip.

Tiny Tapeout tile Google shuttle wafer.space die this chip
Each marker is one version of the design: hover over it or focus it for details, and select it to open its page. On a phone, the table below lists every one.

As a table
DesignMade onWhenVersionSize
TinyQV RISC-V SoC Tiny Tapeout 6Apr 2024 TinyQV RISC-V SoC2 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout IHP 0.2Nov 2024 TinyQV RISC-V SoC2 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout IHP 25aMar 2025 TinyQV RISC-V SoC3 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout IHP 25bSep 2025 TinyQV - Crowdsourced RISC-V SoC5 × 4 tiles
Tiny Tapeout SKY 25aSep 2025 TinyQV 'Asteroids' - Crowdsourced RISC-V SoC; TinyQV 'Berzerk' - Crowdsourced RISC-V SoC8 × 4 tiles, 4 × 4 tiles
Tiny Tapeout SKY 25bNov 2025 TinyQV RISC-V SoC3 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout GF 0.1Nov 2025 TinyQV RISC-V SoCin a shared block
Tiny Tapeout GF 0.2Nov 2025 TinyQV RISC-V SoC3 × 4 tiles
wafer.space Run 1Dec 2025 TQVA TinyQV - Crowdsourced RISC-V SoC; TQVB TinyQV - Crowdsourced RISC-V SoC (0.5x1); TQVC TinyQV - Crowdsourced RISC-V SoC (1x0.5)TQVA ½ × ½ slot, TQVB ½ × 1 slot, TQVC 1 × ½ slot
Tiny Tapeout GF 0.3Jun 2026 TinyQV RISC-V SoC4 × 2 tiles
wafer.space Run 2Jul 2026 TQVA TinyQV - Crowdsourced RISC-V SoC; TQVC TinyQV - Crowdsourced RISC-V SoC (1x0.5); TQVD TinyQV - RISC-V SoC with HDMI output; TQVE TinyQV - RISC-V SoC with experimental pad setupTQVA ½ × ½ slot, TQVC 1 × ½ slot, TQVD ½ × ½ slot, TQVE ½ × ½ slot
KianV RISC-V Linux SoC Tiny Tapeout 5Nov 2023 KianV uLinux SoC8 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout 6Apr 2024 KianV uLinux SoC8 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout 7Jun 2024 KianV RISC-V RV32E Baremetal SoC3 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout IHP 0.2Nov 2024 KianV RISC-V RV32E Baremetal SoC4 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout GF 0.1Nov 2025 KianV uLinux SoCin a shared block
Tiny Tapeout GF 0.2Nov 2025 KianV uLinux SoC4 × 4 tiles
wafer.space Run 1Dec 2025 KIAN KianV: A 32-bit RISC-V Linux SoC taped out on GF180MCU1 × 1 slot
Tiny Tapeout IHP 26aMar 2026 KianV SV32 TT Linux SoC8 × 4 tiles
Tiny Tapeout GF 0.3Jun 2026 KianV uLinux SoC4 × 4 tiles
wafer.space Run 2Jul 2026 KIAN KianV: A 32-bit RISC-V Linux SoC taped out on GF180MCU Run 21 × 1 slot
raybox-zero Tiny Tapeout 4Sep 2023 raybox-zero4 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout 7Jun 2024 raybox-zero TT07 edition6 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout IHP 0.2Nov 2024 raybox-zero TTIHP0p2 edition4 × 2 tiles
Tiny Tapeout GF 0.1Nov 2025 raybox-zero TT07 editionin a shared block
Tiny Tapeout GF 0.2Nov 2025 raybox-zero TTGF0p2 edition3 × 4 tiles
Tiny Tapeout IHP 0.4Mar 2026 raybox-zero TTIHP0p4 edition6 × 2 tiles
wafer.space Run 2Jul 2026 AMM1 raybox-zero wafer.space run 2 half height1 × ½ slot

The 24 projects

On this first Tiny Tapeout GF180MCU chip the projects did not get tiles of their own: all 24 were synthesised and placed together in one block, behind the multiplexer that selects one at a time. So each project's size here is counted from that block's netlist, cell by cell. Original tiles is the project's size on the Tiny Tapeout chip it first came from.

AddressProjectAuthorOriginal tiles Logic cellsFlip-flopsShare of the block
000 Chip ROM Uri Shaked 1×1 in the shared logic
001 TinyTapeout Factory Test Tiny Tapeout 1×1 70 9 0.1%
002 Pad Test htfab 1×1 218 27 0.3%
003 Simon Says memory game Uri Shaked 1×1 1,242 194 2.0%
004 VGA clock Matt Venn 1×1 847 146 1.3%
005 7-Seg 'Tiny Tapeout' Display J. Rosenthal & htfab 1×1 55 4 0.1%
006 Neptune guitar tuner (proportional window, version b, debug output on bidir pins, larger set of frequencies) Pat Deegan 1×1 868 136 1.4%
007 RGB Mixer demo Matt Venn 1×1 551 111 0.9%
008 MULDIV unit (4-bit signed/unsigned) Darryl Miles 1×1 in the shared logic
009 One Sprite Pony Leo Moser 1×1 1,190 255 1.9%
010 VGA Experiments Tom Keddie 1×1 950 95 1.5%
011 Super Mario Tune on A Piezo Speaker Milosch Meriac 1×1 442 52 0.7%
012 ROTFPGA v2 htfab 1×1 2,179 64 3.5%
013 Character Selector Dakota W Winslow 1×1 141 3 0.2%
014 Flappy VGA Daniel Robinson 1×1 683 82 1.1%
015 Classic 8-bit era Programmable Sound Generator AY-3-8913 ReJ aka Renaldas Zioma 1×1 1,351 219 2.1%
016 UART uwuifier Anish Singhani 1×1 634 135 1.0%
017 USB CDC (Serial) Uri Shaked 1×2 2,622 383 4.2%
018 Tiny Breakout Robbert-Jan de Jager 1×2 1,961 400 3.1%
019 TinyQV Risc-V SoC Michael Bell 2×2 5,477 1,036 8.7%
020 VGA Dino Game Anish Singhani 2×2 3,143 263 5.0%
021 No Time for Squares Tommy Thorn 3×2 6,459 651 10.3%
022 raybox-zero TT07 edition algofoogle (Anton Maurovic) 6×2 12,093 1,357 19.2%
023 KianV uLinux SoC Hirosh Dabui 8×2 19,265 2,563 30.6%
The multiplexer and controller, with Chip ROM and the MULDIV unit 5593 0.9%

A cell belongs to the project its nets are named after, or to the one project of the cells it is wired to. Chip ROM and the MULDIV unit are purely combinational, so synthesis kept no names for their cells: they are counted with the shared multiplexer and controller. The 63,000 logic cells in all are exactly the block's logic cells as measured from the layout.

The blocks

The die's own blocks, each measured like a design: the shared block that holds the projects, eight standard cell tests and the pad test buffer.

Test structures 9

Shared project block 1

Data and method

The die and its blocks are measured from the public layout; each project's share of the shared block is counted from that block's netlist.

  • Logic cells are standard cell instances, excluding fillers, taps, antenna diodes and tie cells.
  • Transistors are places where gate polysilicon crosses diffusion, not counting dummy fill.
  • Core area is the whole block.
  • Bond pads are the pad openings in the pad ring, or in a second ring of pads inside it for chip-on-board bonding; probe pads are the others, next to the blocks they test. Letters and logos on the pad layer are not pads.
  • Theoretical maximum tiles one cell at its placement boundary with no routing.
  • Densest 0.1 mm square is the best 0.1 mm square anywhere in each die, sliding in 20 µm steps and avoiding SRAM, given per mm².

What is Tiny Tapeout?

Tiny Tapeout is the quickest and cheapest way to get your own design made on a real chip.

Many designs share one Tiny Tapeout chip. Each project gets one or more small tiles, and a multiplexer on the chip connects the one you choose to the pins. Draw your first design in the browser with no experience by following the digital design guide, or write it in Verilog or another HDL; Tiny Tapeout's templates build and check it on GitHub. The chip comes on a demo board that selects your design and drives it.

Tiny Tapeout also runs workshops and supports teaching in universities and schools. Browse every Tiny Tapeout chip and the projects proven in silicon, or read the Tiny Tapeout FAQ.

The Tiny Tapeout demo board, with the socket in the middle where the chip's breakout card plugs in
Tiny Tapeout chips come on a breakout card that plugs into the middle of the demo board. Its RP2350 selects a project and drives its clock; the DIP switches, the seven-segment display and the Pmod headers connect to the project's pins. Render: Tiny Tapeout, tt-demo-pcb, Apache 2.0.

Tiny Tapeout and wafer.space are independent companies that work together (announcement). Tiny Tapeout runs its own shuttles: it takes the projects, builds the die, and sells and supports the chips and boards. wafer.space has the dies manufactured on its GF180MCU runs, and these pages are wafer.space's measurements of them. For anything about a Tiny Tapeout project, chip or order, contact Tiny Tapeout.