Google GF180MCU test shuttle (MPW‑18H1)Made on a private GlobalFoundries MPW run

4 public designs on one GF180MCU reticle

What was built

The run as a whole: what its designs add up to.

A private GF180MCU test shuttle on GlobalFoundries' MPW service, with four test designs. Each sat in the user area of the Caravel harness, which took 55% of every die for its management SoC, pads and wiring. They are measured here the same way as wafer.space's own runs, for comparison with a wafer.space die, where everything inside the pad ring is your design. The other Google shuttle measured here is GFMPW-0.

4

Public designs

filling all 4 slots

4

Open source

with a public repository

272k

Transistors

across the unique designs

8k

Logic cells

gates and flip-flops

4

Whole dies

every slot a whole die

Private designs on the reticle are not in the public layout and are not counted. Designs placed more than once are counted once.

Make a chip of your own

These designs were made free on one of Google's shuttles. The same GF180MCU process is open to anyone on wafer.space: start small with a Tiny Tapeout tile, or go straight to a whole die on the next wafer.space run.

Make a whole chip of your own

Book a die to itself on wafer.space Run 3: orders close 9 December 2026.

Reserve a slot
Or start with a Tiny Tapeout tile

Tiny Tapeout GF 26c and 26d take projects until 7 December 2026, to be made on wafer.space Run 3.

Submit a project
Get a Tiny Tapeout chip

Every Tiny Tapeout chip comes on a board you can plug in, with all of its projects ready to try.

Buy a chip and board

The reticle

Every design rendered from the layout at the same scale and placed where it sits on the 8 × 10.4 mm reticle. It is drawn at the same scale as the 30 × 23.4 mm reticles of wafer.space Runs 1 and 2, so its dies can be compared with theirs. Point at a die to see its name, and select it for its details.Every die is listed further down.

Slots

How much of the reticle each design took: a 1 × 1 slot is a whole die of its own.

1 × 14
Total4

Layout on GitHub

Shuttle status

How this run went, from the call for designs to the finished chips.

  • 1 February 2023 Tapeout flow set up Google adds the GF180MCU tapeout flow to the four projects' repositories
  • 26 February – 3 March 2023 Designs submitted The designers' final layouts for GF submission
  • about 3 March 2023 Tapeout Final Caravel dies written (2–3 March) for GlobalFoundries' private MPW run 18H1
  • 20 December 2023 Final dies published Google publishes the final dies and the shuttle's list of projects
  • 2024 Silicon results published Measured results of the OpenFASoC analog front-end (0004), in IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine
  • June – July 2025 Die photographs John McMaster photographs dies 0001 and 0004 for Silicon Prawn
  • Today, 24 October 2026

From the shuttle repositories, the dies' GDS headers, the OpenFASoC paper and the Silicon Prawn photographs (no schedule was published for this private shuttle).

How people used their silicon

Where the area of 4 dies (80 mm² of silicon) actually went

43%
55%
  • Logic cells <1% — gates and flip-flops doing the design's actual work
  • Filler and tap cells 1% — inserted by the tools to keep rows continuous and wells tied
  • Other 43% — routing channels, analog and custom layout, power grid and empty space
  • Outside the user area 55% — the Caravel harness around the user's design: its management SoC, pads and wiring

What people built

The kinds of design on this run.

Test structures 2 Analog and mixed-signal 1 Other digital 1

Standard cell libraries

The ready-made gate libraries the designs were built from: how many tracks tall each cell is, and the voltage it runs at.

Standard cell libraryLogic cellsShare
OSU 9t-3.3V gf180mcu_osu_sc_gp9t3v3 7k 88%
7t-5V gf180mcu_fd_sc_mcu7t5v0 1k 12%

Area budget of every design

Each bar is one die, split the same way as above. Sorted by how much of the die is logic.

Which parts of the process were used

Transistor voltages and optional devices across the 4 designs

Transistor voltages

3.3 V 3
5 V 2
6 V 1

A design counts for a voltage when its standard cells, SRAM or its own transistors use it. 5 V and 6 V transistors share the thick gate oxide; a marker layer in the layout tells them apart.

Gate oxides

TransistorsOwn designWith the pad ringWhich (own design)
3.3 V and 5 V/6 V 22 Fitbit test IC 1, Analog front-end for sensor readout (OpenFASoC)
3.3 V only 11 OSU 3.3V standard cell test (vlsiffra adder)
5 V/6 V only 00

3.3 V transistors have the thin gate oxide; 5 V and 6 V ones share the thick one. "Own design" counts the standard cells, SRAM and transistors the designer chose; "with the pad ring" adds the transistors of the I/O pad cells, measured in each design's pad ring. No transistors of their own: LibreSilicon Danube River test tile.

What fits on 1 mm² of GF180MCU silicon?

Theoretical maximum against what designers achieved

The maximum packs one cell type edge to edge with no room for wiring. Real designs need the wiring. Each box gives the most of a cell that fits with any GF180MCU library, then with the libraries this run used.

~114k

Inverters per mm²

GF180MCU maximum,
with AS 7t-3.3V inv_2

With this run's libraries:

7t-5V: 114k inv_1

~91k

NAND gates per mm²

GF180MCU maximum,
with 7t-5V nand2_1

With this run's libraries:

OSU 9t-3.3V: 51k nand2_1

7t-5V: 91k nand2_1

~76k

Buffers per mm²

GF180MCU maximum,
with AS 7t-3.3V buff_2

With this run's libraries:

OSU 9t-3.3V: 49k buf_1

7t-5V: 76k buf_1

~17k

Flip-flops per mm²

GF180MCU maximum,
with AS 7t-3.3V dfxtp_2

With this run's libraries:

OSU 9t-3.3V: 11k dff_1

7t-5V: 16k dffq_1

This shuttle has only 1 die with 1,000 or more logic cells, too few for a best or typical figure. For densities across dozens of designs, see wafer.space Run 2.

Sizing your own design

With only 1 die of 1,000 or more logic cells, this shuttle cannot say what a slot typically holds. wafer.space Run 2's page sizes each slot from dozens of designs.

Logic density of every digital design

A digital die here is one with 1,000 or more logic cells. Solid bar: average over the core. Outlined bar: the densest mm² outside SRAM (a dash where memory covers most of the design). The scale ends at the buffer theoretical maximum (76k cells/mm²). The numbers are core / densest, in logic cells per mm².

Every digital die's densities as a table
DesignSlotLibraryLogic cells Inside core
per mm²
Densest mm²
per mm²
Core coveredCore
mm²
OSU 3.3V standard cell test (vlsiffra adder) 0002 1 × 1OSU 9t-3.3V 7,341 816 7,341 2% 9.00

The projects

Every design on this run: an index, then grouped by what it does. Select one for its layout, its measurements and any die photographs.

Design index

All 4 public designs by their code, with the slot each took and how much logic it packs.

Swipe the table sideways for more columns.

Test structures 2

Analog and mixed-signal 1

Other digital 1

The real silicon

Optical micrographs of the fabricated dies © 2025 John McMaster, CC BY 4.0

Microscope images © 2025 John McMaster, CC BY 4.0. Each project page links to a zoomable viewer of its die. The full-resolution images are online too.

Data and method

Everything on this page is measured from the public layout; the dates come from the shuttle repositories, the dies' GDS headers, the OpenFASoC paper and the Silicon Prawn photographs (no schedule was published for this private shuttle).

  • Logic cells are standard cell instances, excluding fillers, taps, antenna diodes and tie cells.
  • Transistors are places where gate polysilicon crosses diffusion, not counting dummy fill.
  • Core area is the area of each die's user_project_wrapper cell.
  • Excluded from the measurements: pad ring (gf180mcu_*_io__*); caravel harness (caravel_core, caravel_power_routing, chip_io, caravel_logo, caravel_motto, copyright_block, open_source, user_id_textblock); seal ring (sealring). Die sizes are measured on the whole die, and bond pads on the whole die apart from its seal ring.
  • Bond pads are the pad openings in the pad ring, or in a second ring of pads inside it for chip-on-board bonding; probe pads are the others, next to the blocks they test. Letters and logos on the pad layer are not pads.
  • Theoretical maximum tiles one cell at its placement boundary with no routing.
  • Densest mm² is the best 1 mm square anywhere in each die, sliding in 0.1 mm steps and avoiding SRAM.